Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2011 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2011 (8) TMI 1044 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Issues:
1. Interpretation of section 5B of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act.
2. Tax liability in a case involving movement of goods between manufacturing units in different states.
3. Applicability of inter-State sale tax provisions.

Analysis:

1. The primary issue in this case revolved around the interpretation of section 5B of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act. The assessee, a manufacturer of captive diesel generating sets, faced a tax liability dispute due to a contract of sale with Telecom Electrical Division in Mangalore. The assessee procured the goods from their branch office in Goa, where sales tax was paid. The assessing authority added the transaction to the returns filed in Karnataka, leading to a series of appeals and revisions. The revisional authority ultimately held that the deletion of the addition was improper under section 5B, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

2. The second issue involved determining the tax liability when goods are moved between manufacturing units in different states. The appellant contended that since the goods were moved from Goa to Mangalore and the invoice was raised by the Goa unit, no additional tax should be payable under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act. However, the revisional authority disagreed, emphasizing that the contract was executed in Mangalore, payment was made there, and the movement of goods was not directly linked to the contract, thus attracting tax liability under section 5B.

3. Finally, the case touched upon the applicability of inter-State sale tax provisions. The appellant argued that a previous judgment involving a different scenario was not applicable to their case, as the contract, payment, and execution all occurred within Karnataka. The revisional authority justified its decision by highlighting that the movement of goods from Goa was a separate transaction, not affecting the nature of the sale within Karnataka. Ultimately, the court dismissed the appeal, upholding the tax liability under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates