Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1996 (10) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1996 (10) TMI 22 - HC - Income Tax

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of the trust creation.
2. Justification of deleting the income from Victory Offset Printers from the assessee's assessment.
3. Justification of dismissing the Revenue's quantum appeal without addressing the merits.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of the Trust Creation:

The core issue is whether a valid trust was created, thereby transferring the property and income to the said trust. The trust was created by a deed dated May 2, 1979, with the trustees being the assessee and his wife, and the beneficiary being their minor son. The trust was initially formed with a capital of Rs. 5,001. The Income-tax Officer rejected the validity of the trust, viewing it as a device to reduce tax liability, considering the minor son could not possess independent funds. The first appellate authority agreed, labeling the trust as a sham transaction, and questioned the propriety of the minor's funds and the dual capacity of the assessee as both seller and managing trustee.

The Tribunal, however, found the trust valid under Section 94 of the Indian Trusts Act, noting that a trust could be declared by a person with reference to another's property for that person's benefit. The Tribunal concluded that the trust was genuine and legally created, with the transfer of business funds being properly accounted for in the trust's records.

2. Justification of Deleting the Income from Victory Offset Printers from the Assessee's Assessment:

The Tribunal observed that the transaction dated April 2, 1979, showed the purchase of the business for the minor's benefit using the minor's funds. The Tribunal noted that the funds were transferred from the partnership firm to the trust's accounts, indicating the transaction's legitimacy. The Tribunal held that the legal effect of the transaction could not be ignored simply because it reduced the transferor's tax liability. The Tribunal also addressed the concern that the assessee controlled the business by noting that the dual capacity of the assessee as trustee and guardian did not invalidate the trust or the transaction.

3. Justification of Dismissing the Revenue's Quantum Appeal Without Addressing the Merits:

Given the affirmative answers to the first two questions, the Tribunal did not find it necessary to address the third question, as it became redundant.

Conclusion:

The High Court affirmed the Tribunal's findings, holding that the trust was validly created and the property was legally transferred to the trust. The court rejected the Revenue's arguments, noting that the dual capacity of the assessee did not invalidate the transaction. The court emphasized that the arrangement's tax implications did not render it a sham transaction. Consequently, the income from Victory Offset Printers should be assessed in the hands of the trust, not the assessee.

The court answered the questions in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue, affirming the Tribunal's decision and declining to address the third question due to its redundancy. Copies of the judgment were ordered to be forwarded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates