9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Validity of order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax for block assessment and stay of recovery of tax pending appeal before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. Analysis: The judgment dealt with three writ petitions presenting the same question of law, challenging the validity of an order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, regarding block assessment and stay of tax recovery pending appeal. The petitioners, a public limited company engaged in various construction projects, filed writ petitions seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the order. The order in question was communicated by the first respondent, rejecting the application for stay of tax collection pending appeal before the Tribunal. The main contention revolved around the interpretation of section 220(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and a circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes in 1969. The petitioner's counsel relied on the circular to argue that the rejection of the application by the Commissioner was a non-exercise of jurisdiction. On the other hand, the Revenue's counsel contended that the circular did not apply when the appeal was not filed under section 246 of the Act. The judgment analyzed the impugned order passed by the Commissioner, which stated that the circular was not relevant to block assessment and directed the assessee to approach the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for stay. The court examined the circular's context, emphasizing that it pertained to cases where an appeal under section 246 of the Act was pending, granting the Assessing Officer the power to stay tax collection. Since the appeals in question were filed under section 253 of the Act and pending before the Tribunal, the court held that the Commissioner's order was not illegal. Ultimately, the court dismissed the writ petitions, finding them without merit. However, considering the circumstances, the court allowed the interim orders granted by the court to remain in force for two weeks to enable the petitioners to seek appropriate relief from the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The judgment concluded by dismissing the writ petitions, subject to the continuation of interim orders until a specified date.
|
