9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2012 (4) TMI 573 - AT - Income TaxShort deduction of tax at source - Held that - We dismiss the appeal filed by the Revenue by holding that the Jammu Development Authority is in exempted category where the provisions of section 194(1) are not applicable. We also hold that exception provided in section 194A(3)(iii)(f) of the Act and as per notification the Jammu Development Authority is a creation of J & K Development Act and satisfies the condition at Entry No.39 of the said notification and we hold that no tax was deductible on accrued interest on FDRs of Jammu Development Authority with J & K Bank Ltd. Keeping in view the above discussions we hold that no interference is called for in the well reasoned impugned order passed by the ld. first appellate authority and accordingly we uphold the same.
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the assessee was liable to deduct tax at source on interest accrued on Fixed Deposit Receipts (FDRs) held by the Jammu Development Authority (JDA). 2. Whether the Jammu Development Authority qualifies as a "Corporation" under the relevant Income Tax Act provisions and notifications. 3. Impact of the amendment to Section 10(20) of the Income Tax Act effective from 01.04.2003 on the tax liability of the Jammu Development Authority. Detailed Analysis: 1. Liability to Deduct Tax at Source: The primary issue revolves around whether the assessee was obligated to deduct tax at source on the interest accrued on FDRs held by the Jammu Development Authority (JDA). The Income Tax Officer (TDS) noted that the assessee failed to deduct tax on an interest amount of Rs. 83,24,956 for the assessment year 2006-07. The assessee argued that JDA, being a corporation established under the Jammu & Kashmir Development Act, 1970, was exempt from such deduction as per Notification No.3489 dated 22.10.1970, which exempts "any Corporation established by a Central, State, or Provincial Act." 2. Qualification as a "Corporation": The Assessing Officer (AO) disputed the assessee's claim, arguing that JDA does not qualify as a "Corporation" under the said notification. The AO contended that JDA is a "Local Authority" and not a corporation, as it files its income tax returns under this status. The AO further stated that JDA was established under the Jammu & Kashmir Development Act, 1970, and not by the Act itself, thus not fitting the exemption criteria. 3. Amendment to Section 10(20): The AO also highlighted the amendment to Section 10(20) of the Income Tax Act, effective from 01.04.2003, which made the income of local authorities taxable. This amendment was used to argue that JDA's income, including interest on FDRs, was subject to tax deduction at source. Findings by CIT(A): The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that JDA qualifies as a "body corporate" created through a state act, thus fitting the exemption criteria under Notification No.3489. The CIT(A) noted that the year of JDA's creation and the notification issuance being the same was irrelevant. The CIT(A) further clarified that the amendment to Section 10(20) was not pertinent to the issue of whether TDS was deductible on the interest accrued to JDA. Revenue's Appeal: The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s decision, arguing that the CIT(A) failed to appreciate the distinction between a corporation established by an Act and one established under an Act. The Revenue also contended that JDA, being a body corporate and not a corporation, did not qualify for the exemption under Section 194A(3)(iii)(f) of the Income Tax Act. Tribunal's Decision: The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. It affirmed that JDA, being a creation of the Jammu & Kashmir Development Act, 1970, fits the exemption criteria under Notification No.3489. The Tribunal referenced a similar case adjudicated by the ITAT Delhi Bench, where the Ghaziabad Development Authority was held to be exempt from TDS under similar circumstances. The Tribunal concluded that no tax was deductible on the accrued interest on JDA's FDRs with J&K Bank Ltd. Conclusion: The Tribunal dismissed all five appeals filed by the Revenue, confirming that JDA falls within the exempted category where the provisions of Section 194A(1) are not applicable. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, ensuring that the demand created under Sections 201 and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act was deleted, and the assessee was not treated as in default. Order Pronounced: The order was pronounced in the open court on 24th April 2012, dismissing all the Revenue's appeals for the assessment years 2006-07 to 2010-11.
|
