9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The issues involved in the judgment are the valuation of imported goods, inclusion of royalty and technical know-how fees in the assessable value, and the proper interpretation of agreements related to services and distribution of spare parts. Valuation of imported goods: The Revenue filed an appeal against an order where the adjudicating authority accepted the transaction value declared in the invoice by the respondent. The Revenue contended that the respondent admitted to paying royalty on total net sales value of parts purchased from collaborators. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) accepted the respondent's plea that the royalty was related to services rendered, not to the distribution of spare parts. The Revenue argued that the agreements related to royalty and technical fees were not produced before the lower adjudicating authority. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order, stating that the royalty and technical fee were related to services, not to the distribution of spare parts, and hence not includable in the price of imported goods. Inclusion of royalty and technical know-how fees: The respondent contended that they were not engaged in manufacturing but in providing services and distributing turbine parts. They argued that the royalty was for services only, not for the distribution of spare parts. The Tribunal found that the respondents were providing services related to turbines and distributing parts, with no amount paid towards technical fees. The lower adjudicating authority accepted the transaction value, and the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this decision. The Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner (Appeals) that the royalty and technical fees were related to services, such as repair services, and not to the distribution of spare parts, thus not includable in the price of imported goods. Proper interpretation of agreements: The Commissioner (Appeals) found that the royalty payment was related to services offered by the respondent, not spare parts distribution, based on the agreements. He also noted that technical fee payments were related to repair services, not spare parts distribution. The Commissioner (Appeals) concluded that the royalty and technical fees were not includable in the price of imported goods. The Tribunal upheld this decision, stating that there was no merit in the Revenue's appeal and dismissed it.
|
