Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2009 (7) TMI 1229 - SCH - Central ExciseClassification of product Appy Fizz (juice) - decision in the case of COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. BHOPAL Versus PARLE AGRO PVT. LTD. 2008 (3) TMI 67 - CESTAT NEW DELHI contested where it was held that drinks based on fruit juice are specifically classifiable u/h 22029020 as per the certificate the product in question contains 23% of apple juice therefore classifiable u/h 22029020 not u/h 22021010 as aerated water - Held that - the decision in the above case upheld - appeal dismissed - decided against Revenue.
|