9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
The issue involves the validity of a notice for reassessment issued to the assessee u/s 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the notice was within the period of limitation. Summary: The High Court, Delhi, considered an appeal by the revenue against an order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'D', relevant for the assessment year 1997-98. The Tribunal found that the notice for reassessment issued to the assessee u/s 148 was beyond the period of limitation as per the proviso to section 147 of the Act. The reasons for issuing the notice included the assessee's failure to add back lease equalization charges while calculating book profit u/s 115JA. The Court noted that the assessee had disclosed all relevant facts regarding the charges, which were even added back in the original assessment order. The Court emphasized that the duty to draw inferences from disclosed facts lies with the Assessing Officer. It was held that there was no failure to disclose material facts by the assessee, and the Assessing Officer's failure to draw the correct inference did not imply non-disclosure. Consequently, the Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, stating that no substantial question of law arose, and the appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee.
|
