9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The judgment involves the quashing of the appointment of a professor at the National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS) by the Karnataka High Court, based on the Selection Committee's proceedings and the subsequent appointment of Dr. Gauri Devi. Details of the Judgment: Issue 1: Quashing of Appointment The Karnataka High Court quashed the appointment of Dr. Gauri Devi as the professor of Neurology at NIMHANS, citing lack of fair consideration by the Selection Committee and absence of reasons for the selection decision. Issue 2: Lack of Reasons for Selection The High Court questioned the absence of reasons for preferring Dr. Gauri Devi over other candidates, emphasizing that the Selection Committee's decision lacked a rational nexus between the facts considered and the conclusion drawn. Legal Analysis: The Supreme Court clarified that the Selection Committee's function is administrative, not judicial, and not bound to provide reasons for its decisions unless mandated by law. The Court distinguished the requirement of recording reasons from the principle of procedural fairness, stating that administrative decisions need not be supported by reasons unless legally required. Fair Consideration by Selection Committee: The Supreme Court found that the Selection Committee's decision to place Dr. Kalyana Raman second in the panel of names indicated fair consideration, despite the Committee's later assertion that he did not meet the minimum eligibility requirements. The Court upheld the expertise and impartiality of the Selection Committee members, cautioning against undue interference in their decisions. Conclusion: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the High Court's judgment and reinstating Dr. Gauri Devi's appointment as the professor of Neurology at NIMHANS, without imposing any costs in the case.
|
