9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2012 (2) TMI 493 - HC - Income TaxAddition of provision for warranty for the purposes of computation of income - Whether provision for future warranty expenses is contingent liability or allowable under section 37 - ITAT directing the AO to exclude the ?provision for warranty while computing book profits under section 115 JB - Decided in favour of assessee Foreign exchange fluctuation loss - ITAT deleting the addition on account of enhanced WDV of fixed assets as a result of foreign exchange fluctuation - Decided in favour of assessee Section 234D is applicable with effect from the assessment year 2004-05 and not applicable to the earlier assessment years. Advertisement and sales promotion expenses allowed Claim of deduction on account of advertisement and publicity expenses in all the three assessment years allowed Including the foreign exchange gain in the profits eligible for deduction under section 10A/10B
Issues:
1. Provision for warranty expenses 2. Foreign exchange fluctuation loss 3. Section 234D of the Income Tax Act 4. Advertisement and sales promotion expenses 5. Disallowance of 10% of advertisement and sales promotion expenses 6. Inclusion of foreign exchange gain in profits eligible for deduction under section 10A/10B 7. Transfer pricing adjustments Issue 1 - Provision for warranty expenses: The High Court considered whether provision for future warranty expenses is contingent liability or allowable under section 37 of the Income Tax Act. The Court referred to the decision in Rotork Controls India (P) Ltd. Vs. CIT and concluded that the provision for warranty, based on past experience and scientific basis, is allowable. No substantial question of law arose in this regard. Issue 2 - Foreign exchange fluctuation loss: The Court analyzed whether the addition of foreign exchange fluctuation loss should be deleted. Referring to CIT Vs. Woodward Governor India (P) Ltd., the Court ruled in favor of the respondent-assessee, stating that no substantial question of law needed to be framed as the issue was covered by the Supreme Court decision. Issue 3 - Section 234D of the Income Tax Act: The Court examined whether the provisions of section 234D are clarificatory and whether interest under this section is chargeable from AY 2004-05. Citing DIT Vs. Jacabs Civil Incorporated, the Court held that Section 234D is applicable from the assessment year 2004-05 onwards, not for earlier assessment years. Issue 4 - Advertisement and sales promotion expenses: The Court considered the deletion of disallowance of expenses on account of advertisement and sales promotion, stating they are revenue in nature. Referring to CIT Vs. Salora International Ltd., the Court ruled in favor of the respondent-assessee. No substantial question of law was framed in this regard. Issue 5 - Disallowance of 10% of advertisement and sales promotion expenses: The Court analyzed whether disallowance of 10% of advertisement and sales promotion expenses, attributable to brand promotion, was justified. Referring to Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Adidas India Marketing, the Court dismissed the appeal, stating that the expenses were incurred for business purposes and were eligible for deduction. Issue 6 - Inclusion of foreign exchange gain in profits eligible for deduction under section 10A/10B: The Court examined whether foreign exchange gain should be included in profits eligible for deduction under section 10A/10B. Relying on a previous tribunal decision, the Court upheld the inclusion of foreign exchange gain, considering it as part of export turnover. Issue 7 - Transfer pricing adjustments: The Court addressed the deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer based on the report submitted by the Transfer Pricing Officer. The Court indicated that the question of transfer pricing adjustments, including advertisement expenses for sale promotion, would be examined further. The judgment covered various tax-related issues, providing detailed analysis and referencing relevant legal precedents to support the decisions made by the High Court.
|
