9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Interpretation of section 187(2) of the Income-tax Act regarding dissolution of a partnership firm upon the death of a partner. 2. Determination of whether two separate assessments are required for a partnership firm before and after the death of a partner. Analysis: The High Court of Madras addressed the issue of whether, under section 187(2) of the Income-tax Act, a partnership firm is dissolved upon the death of a partner, necessitating separate assessments for different periods. The case involved a partnership formed under a deed governed by the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, where the death of a partner occurred on July 17, 1972. The court considered that, in the absence of a contrary contract, the firm is dissolved by the death of a partner as per section 42 of the Partnership Act. It was observed that the subsequent conduct of surviving partners is irrelevant in determining the existence of an agreement to continue the business after a partner's death. The Tribunal found that a new partnership was constituted after the death, leading to the requirement of separate assessments for the periods before and after the death for the assessment year 1973-74. The court emphasized that in the absence of a clause in the original partnership deed for the continuation of the firm, oral agreements cannot amend a written contract, which can only be varied by another written contract. The reconstitution of the firm under a separate deed post the partner's death indicated the absence of continuity of the original firm. This aspect was crucial in determining the necessity of separate assessments as per the provisions of the Income-tax Act. Referring to a similar case before the Supreme Court, the court highlighted that a change in the constitution of a firm, as specified in section 187, did not apply in the present scenario. The Supreme Court's decision reinforced the requirement for two assessments in cases where the original partnership ceases to exist due to the death of a partner. Considering the facts, the court concluded that the Tribunal's order directing separate assessments was valid, as there was no continuation of the original partnership after the partner's death. The absence of a clause for continuation further supported the decision to conduct separate assessments for the assessment year in question, aligning with the provisions of the Indian Partnership Act. In conclusion, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, citing the Supreme Court's judgment and the provisions of the Partnership Act. The court affirmed the necessity of two separate assessments due to the dissolution of the original partnership firm upon the death of a partner, thereby ruling in favor of separate assessments for the assessment year under consideration.
|
