1996 (5) TMI 23 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
Whether the assessee is entitled to deductions under sections 80HH and 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for being an 'industrial undertaking' engaged in the manufacture or production of articles or things.

Analysis:
The case involved a dispute regarding the eligibility of the assessee, a registered firm engaged in the construction of overhead water tanks, for deductions claimed under sections 80HH and 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) had initially denied the deductions, which were later allowed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal considered the construction of piles for overhead water tanks as a process of manufacture, leading to the allowance of deductions. However, the Department challenged this decision by moving an application under section 256(1) of the Act.

The High Court referred to a Supreme Court decision in CIT v. Shankar Construction Co. [1993] 204 ITR 412, where it was held that construction activities like building dams do not qualify as manufacturing or production for the purpose of deductions under section 80HH. The High Court also cited its own decision in CIT v. P. D. Agrawal and Co. [1997] 226 ITR 924, where it was established that construction of buildings or roads does not constitute an industrial undertaking engaged in manufacturing or production.

Based on the legal precedents and the facts of the case, the High Court concluded that the assessee's construction of overhead water tanks did not qualify as an industrial undertaking engaged in the manufacture or production of articles or things. Therefore, the Tribunal's decision to allow the deductions was deemed unjustified in law. Consequently, the court ruled in favor of the Department and against the assessee, denying the claimed deductions under sections 80HH and 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

The High Court disposed of the case without any order as to costs and directed the transmission of the order to the Tribunal for further action in accordance with the law. The judgment highlighted the importance of distinguishing between construction activities and manufacturing or production processes for the purpose of claiming deductions under the Income-tax Act, 1961.