9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Trading addition made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) after rejecting the books of account of the assessee.
Details of the Judgment: Issue 1: Trading Addition and Rejection of Books of Account The assessee, a partnership firm engaged in trading, faced discrepancies in stock during a survey u/s 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) rejected the books of account due to a low Gross Profit (GP) rate declared by the assessee. The A.O. estimated the income after finding the GP rate for the year was significantly lower than the previous year. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the A.O.'s decision, citing defects and discrepancies in the books of account. The A.O. applied a higher GP rate, resulting in trading additions. The assessee contended that the rejection of books was unwarranted as excess stock was declared and offered for tax. The Tribunal found the rejection justified due to discrepancies, low GP rate, and lack of explanation for the fall in GP rate. Issue 2: Verification and Explanation The A.O. verified the trading results and found the GP rate to be only 20.35% for the year, much lower than the previous year's 34.73%. The assessee's explanation of selling frames at low rates due to defects was not substantiated with evidence. The Tribunal noted that the sale of defective frames was minimal compared to total sales, questioning the significant fall in GP rate. The rejection of books was supported by the survey findings, defects in stock maintenance, and unexplained GP rate decrease. Issue 3: Agency Commission Adjustment The A.O. adjusted the GP rate by excluding agency commission income from the previous year, arriving at a fair rate of 30.40%. The Tribunal deemed this adjustment reasonable and upheld the trading addition based on the higher GP rate. The assessee's appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the A.O.
|
