Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2014 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (2) TMI 1199 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Question of law regarding material removed without accounting for under The Central Excise Act, 1944.
2. Reliability of pending proceedings under a distinct law to quash impugned orders.
3. Rejection of books of accounts based on findings during assessment proceedings and electricity consumption for assessment year 2000-01.

Analysis:
1. The appellant argued that the material removed without accounting for is subject to proceedings under The Central Excise Act, 1944, and requested the court to permit the department to await the outcome of those proceedings. However, the court emphasized that the pendency of proceedings under a distinct law cannot be relied upon to quash impugned orders unless it is demonstrated in law. The court highlighted that the Assessing Officer initiated proceedings under the Income Tax Act, 1961, after a search action, and observed consistent losses in the Assessee's books of accounts, which were examined during assessment proceedings and search action.

2. The issue in the appeal pertained to the rejection of books of accounts for the assessment year 2000-01 based on findings during assessment proceedings and electricity consumption. The Tribunal and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) found that no incriminating material was found during the search action, and the details of electricity consumption were provided to the authorities. The court noted that the returns were accepted year after year, and no incriminating material was found during the search action that could warrant additions under section 153A of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the rejection of books solely based on electricity consumption discrepancies was not justified.

3. The court concluded that the findings of fact did not raise any substantial question of law as argued by the appellant's counsel. Therefore, the court dismissed the appeals, finding no merit in the arguments presented. The judgments of the Tribunal and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) were upheld based on the detailed analysis of the facts and legal provisions presented during the proceedings.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates