Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2013 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2013 (4) TMI 757 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Computation of Book Profit u/s. 115JB of the Act.
2. Taxation of interest on deposits under different heads.
3. Computation of profits of the business of the undertaking and deduction u/s. 10A.
4. Charging of interest u/s. 234B of the Act.

---

Issue 1: Computation of Book Profit u/s. 115JB of the Act:
The appeal challenged the correctness of the order pertaining to A.Y. 2005-06, specifically regarding the computation of Book Profit u/s. 115JB of the Act. The Assessing Officer reduced the deduction u/s. 10A under normal provisions, while the assessee contended that Book Profit should be computed by reducing income credited to the profit and loss account under Sec. 10A. The Tribunal referred to judicial pronouncements, including decisions in Moser Baer India Ltd, Roxy Investments, and Ajanta Pharma Ltd, to conclude that Book Profit u/s. 115JB should be based on Schedule VI of the Companies Act, not the IT Act. Thus, Ground No. 1 & 2 were allowed.

Issue 2: Taxation of Interest on Deposits:
The second issue concerned the taxation of interest on deposits under different heads. The lower authorities taxed it under "Income from other Sources," but the assessee argued it should be under "Profits & gains of business or profession" for deduction u/s. 10A. Referring to a previous Tribunal decision, the Tribunal directed the AO to treat the interest from fixed deposits as income under "Profits & gains of business or profession" eligible for deduction u/s. 10A. Consequently, Ground Nos. 3 & 4 were allowed.

Issue 3: Computation of Profits and Deduction u/s. 10A:
The third issue involved the computation of profits of the business of the undertaking and the deduction u/s. 10A, particularly regarding the setting off of unabsorbed depreciation. Citing the decision in CIT VS Black And Veatch Consulting Pvt. Ltd., the assessee argued that deduction u/s. 10A should be allowed before setting off brought forward business loss and unabsorbed depreciation. The Tribunal, following the jurisdictional High Court's decision, directed the AO to allow deduction u/s. 10A before setting off unabsorbed depreciation and business loss, thus allowing Ground No. 5 to 9.

Issue 4: Charging of Interest u/s. 234B of the Act:
The final grievance related to charging interest u/s. 234B of the Act. The assessee contended that no interest should be levied under this section as the income was taxable under Sec. 115JB. However, considering the decision in JCIT Vs Rolta India Ltd., the Tribunal dismissed this ground of the assessee.

In conclusion, the appeal was partly allowed based on the detailed analysis and application of relevant legal provisions and judicial precedents to each issue raised by the assessee.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates