9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Whether two separate assessments were required for different periods. 2. Validity of the extinguishment of the first trust and creation of a new trust. 3. Assessment of the trust created on July 1, 1981, under section 161 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Analysis: 1. The case involved the issue of whether two separate assessments were necessary for the periods from January 1, 1981, to June 30, 1981, and July 1, 1981, to December 31, 1981. The assessee argued for separate assessments, but the Assessing Officer rejected this claim. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) allowed the appeal, and the Tribunal affirmed this decision. The court held that even if the earlier trust of August 1, 1978, had not been extinguished, creating a new trust with common beneficiaries rendered the old trust defunct. Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the assessee on this issue. 2. The validity of the extinguishment of the first trust created on August 1, 1978, and the subsequent creation of a new trust on July 1, 1981, was also in question. The Revenue argued that the first trust could not be extinguished as it was irrevocable unless the beneficiaries consented. However, the court found that the corpus of the first trust had been transferred to the new trust, making the old trust defunct. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision for separate assessments for the two periods, and the court ruled against the Revenue on this issue as well. 3. The third issue involved the assessment of the trust created on July 1, 1981, under section 161 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal confirmed the Commissioner's decision to assess this trust in a representative capacity under section 161. The court agreed with this assessment and ruled in favor of the assessee on this issue, concluding that all three questions were answered against the Revenue and in favor of the assessee.
|
