Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2014 (10) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (10) TMI 857 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Whether provision for doubtful debts and provision for loss of assets are required to be added back to the book profit under Section 115JA of the Income Tax Act, 1961?

Analysis:
The High Court judgment involved an appeal by the Revenue challenging the Tribunal's decision regarding the treatment of provision for doubtful debts and provision for loss of assets in the computation of book profit under Section 115JA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee, a banking business, had claimed deductions for bad and doubtful debts as well as losses of assets in their income tax return for the assessment year 1999-2000. The Assessing Authority initially disallowed these deductions, considering them as provisions for future losses rather than ascertained liabilities. The Appellate Authority, however, allowed the deductions based on precedents and relevant provisions. The Tribunal upheld the Appellate Authority's decision, citing judgments and RBI guidelines. The primary issue was whether these deductions should be added back to the book profit as required under Section 115JA of the Act.

The Court considered the precedent set in the case of CIT v. Yokogawa India Ltd., emphasizing the distinction between actual write-offs and provisions for bad and doubtful debts. It was clarified that if bad debts or doubtful debts are reduced from loans and advances on the balance sheet, the Explanation to Section 115JA or 115JB is not applicable. The Court highlighted the importance of factual verification in determining the treatment of these provisions in the computation of book profit. Since the material on record did not clarify whether the bad and doubtful debts were reduced from loans and advances, the Court set aside the previous orders and remitted the matter back to the First Appellate Authority for fresh consideration in light of the judgment. The Court emphasized the need for a factual finding before determining the applicability of Section 115JA to these provisions.

In conclusion, the High Court partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the previous orders and remitting the matter back to the First Appellate Authority for a detailed examination in accordance with the legal principles discussed in the judgment. The Court highlighted the significance of factual verification in determining the treatment of provisions for doubtful debts and loss of assets in the computation of book profit under Section 115JA of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates