9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Application under section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 barred by limitation.
Summary: The Supreme Court granted Special Leave in a case where the Delhi Development Authority accepted a tender for construction work, which was completed after a delay. The appellant requested the respondent to finalize bills and release security, leading to a dispute. The High Court dismissed the application under section 20 of the Act as time-barred, which was appealed. The main issue was whether the High Court was correct in ruling the application under section 20 as time-barred. The Court referred to the Limitation Act, 1963, stating that Article 137 applies to such applications. To be eligible for a reference under section 20, there must be an arbitration agreement and a dispute related to it. In this case, a dispute arose when the appellant claimed non-payment, and the respondent remained silent. The cause of action was deemed to arise from the date of the claim, not the completion of work. The Court emphasized that a dispute requires a claim and denial, not just inaction. The application under section 20 was filed within the three-year limit, making it timely. The High Court's decision was overturned, directing them to proceed with the application under section 20 and cover the costs of the appeal. In conclusion, the appeal was allowed, setting aside the High Court's decision on limitation and instructing them to proceed with the arbitration application under section 20 of the Act.
|
