2012 (11) TMI 1116 - AT - Income Tax

Summary

Issues involved:
The judgment involves the taxability of advances received during the year, disallowance of interest on loans, adhoc disallowance of various expenses, and addition of unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Act.

Taxability of advances received during the year:
The Tribunal considered the practice of the assessee in offering income from advances and highlighted the amendment in section 145 of the Act, emphasizing the need for verification at the assessment stage. The AO was directed to verify the claim of the assessee regarding the advances offered in different assessment years to avoid double taxation. The issue was restored back to the AO for further examination.

Disallowance of interest on loans:
The Tribunal confirmed the disallowance of interest on loans taken by the appellant, noting that the money had been borrowed in earlier years for maintaining a certain standard of living related to the nature of the profession. The grounds related to this issue were dismissed based on previous findings.

Adhoc disallowance of expenses:
The AO had made adhoc disallowances under various expense heads, but the Tribunal directed these disallowances to be allowed as deductions for the year under consideration. The nature of the profession of the assessee, being an actor in show business, was considered in allowing these expenses.

Addition of unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Act:
The Tribunal upheld the addition of an amount as unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Act, as the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to explain the source of payment of school fees. Previous findings from a similar case were cited to support the dismissal of the grounds related to this issue.

The judgment was pronounced on 21st November, 2012 by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai, with specific directions and decisions on each issue raised by the assessee.