2010 (8) TMI 983 - AT - Income Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of addition of Rs. 17,50,000/- on account of unexplained share capital.
2. Validity of proceedings initiated u/s 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Summary:

Issue 1: Deletion of Addition of Rs. 17,50,000/- on Account of Unexplained Share Capital

The revenue appealed against the deletion of Rs. 17,50,000/- made by the AO on account of unexplained share capital, arguing that the CIT(A) erred by relying on the decision of the Supreme Court in CIT vs Lovely Exports P. Ltd. The AO had reopened the case based on information from the Investigation Wing, stating that the assessee received accommodation entries. Notices u/s 133(6) sent to the parties were returned with the remark "left," and the AO added Rs. 17,50,000/- as the assessee failed to prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of the share application money.

The CIT(A) deleted the addition, noting that the assessee had discharged its onus by providing necessary evidence to establish the identity of the shareholders. The assessee submitted confirmations, PAN details, and copies of returns of the share applicants. The CIT(A) found that the AO had not applied his mind to the evidence or material collected by the Investigation Wing and had merely relied on the information received without any independent verification.

The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing that the AO did not provide any material or information to the assessee, nor did he allow the assessee to cross-examine the concerned parties. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had furnished comprehensive details, including share application forms, board resolutions, bank statements, and income-tax returns of the shareholders. The AO failed to make any independent inquiries or verify the details provided by the assessee.

Issue 2: Validity of Proceedings Initiated u/s 147

The assessee challenged the validity of the proceedings initiated u/s 147, contending that there was no material to believe that any income had escaped assessment. The Tribunal found that the AO had not mentioned any specific evidence or material in the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment. The AO merely relied on the information from the Investigation Wing without any independent application of mind.

The Tribunal concluded that the AO's action of reopening the assessment was not justified as it was based solely on the information received from the Investigation Wing without any corroborative evidence. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order deleting the addition and dismissed the revenue's appeal.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross-objection, upholding the CIT(A)'s order in deleting the addition of Rs. 17,50,000/- and finding the proceedings initiated u/s 147 to be invalid. The decision was pronounced in the Open Court on 13th August, 2010.