Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2014 (2) TMI 1224 - AT - Income TaxDepreciation claimed by the trust - assessee is a trust registered u/s.12A - Held that - The CIT(Appeals) followed the order of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. CMS Educational & Charitable Trust in 2013 (4) TMI 771 - ITAT CHENNAI and allowed the appeal of the assessee placed reliance on the decisions of the Hon ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Tiny Tots Education Society reported as 2010 (7) TMI 377 - Punjab and Haryana High Court and CIT Vs. Market Committee Pipli reported as 2010 (7) TMI 374 - Punjab and Haryana High Court wherein it has been held that claim of depreciation do not result in double deduction. The CIT(Appeals) applied the ratio laid down in the case of CIT Vs. Vegetable Products Ltd. reported as (1973 (1) TMI 1 - SUPREME Court ) and decided the issue in favour of the assessee.
Issues:
1. Disallowance of depreciation claimed by a trust under section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Interpretation of the applicability of section 11 of the Act to depreciation claimed by a trust. 3. Comparison of judgments from different High Courts regarding the claim of depreciation by trusts. 4. Application of precedents to determine the outcome of the appeal. Analysis: The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT MADRAS involved a dispute regarding the disallowance of depreciation claimed by a trust registered under section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2010-11. The Assessing Officer had disallowed the depreciation, relying on a judgment by the Hon'ble Kerala High Court in a specific case. However, the CIT(Appeals) allowed the appeal of the assessee, citing a different judgment by the Tribunal in the case of M/s. CMS Educational & Charitable Trust, which referred to decisions from the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court. The CIT(Appeals) applied the ratio from the case of CIT Vs. Vegetable Products Ltd., emphasizing that the claim of depreciation does not result in double deduction, ultimately deciding in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal noted that the issue raised in the present appeal was already addressed in the earlier order concerning the CMS Educational & Charitable Trust case. By considering the precedents and the application of legal principles from previous judgments, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue, indicating that the claim of depreciation by the trust was justified under the provisions of the Income Tax Act. The order was pronounced in open court on February 13, 2014, at Chennai, by the Judicial Member, Vikas Awasthy.
|