Home
Issues involved: Appeal against order of ld. CIT(A) regarding depreciation on windmill foundation, infrastructural fee, and transformer as integral part of windmill.
Depreciation on Windmill Foundation: - The Revenue appealed against the order allowing depreciation on windmill foundation. - The ld. CIT(A) directed treating windmill foundation as part of windmill for depreciation based on precedent. - Tribunal confirmed ld. CIT(A)'s decision as no contrary evidence was presented. - Revenue's appeal dismissed for both years under consideration. Depreciation on Infrastructural Fee: - Appeal against ld. CIT(A)'s decision allowing depreciation on infrastructural fee. - Tribunal upheld ld. CIT(A)'s decision based on precedent regarding capitalization of installation cost. - No contrary decision presented, thus confirming ld. CIT(A)'s order. - Revenue's appeal dismissed. Transformer as Integral Part of Windmill: - Appeal against ld. CIT(A)'s ruling considering transformer as integral part of windmill. - Ld. CIT(A) supported the claim based on the function of the transformer in power transmission. - Tribunal upheld ld. CIT(A)'s decision citing precedent regarding transformer's role in power generation. - No opposing decision cited, leading to confirmation of ld. CIT(A)'s order. - Revenue's appeal dismissed for both years. Cross Objections by Assessee: - Assessee's cross objections supported ld. CIT(A)'s decision. - Since no grievance existed, cross objections were deemed infructuous and dismissed. - Both Revenue's appeals and Assessee's cross objections were dismissed.
|