9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Date of setting up of business and corresponding allowance of revenue expenditure. 2. Disallowance of entertainment expenditure. 3. Deletion of disallowance of miscellaneous expenses. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Date of Setting up of Business and Corresponding Allowance of Revenue Expenditure: The primary issue was determining the correct date when the assessee's business was set up, which would affect the allowance of revenue expenditure. The assessee argued that its business was set up on 28-07-1994 when it placed an order for the purchase of VSAT equipment. The revenue contended that the business was set up only on 15-03-1995 when the first hub was established. The CIT (Appeals) concluded that the business was set up on 06-10-1994 when the first supply order was received from Bank of America. The Tribunal examined various judicial precedents, including Western India Vegetable Products Ltd. v. CIT, CIT v. Saurashtra Cement & Chemical Industries Ltd., and CIT v. Franco Tosi Ingegneria, which emphasized the distinction between the setting up of business and the commencement of business. It was held that the business is set up when the first step necessary for the business is taken. In this case, the Tribunal concluded that the business was set up on 28-07-1994 when the purchase order for VSAT equipment was placed, as this was a necessary step for the business. Consequently, the revenue expenses incurred on or after 28-07-1994 were allowed as a deduction. 2. Disallowance of Entertainment Expenditure: The assessee claimed business promotion expenses, part of which was identified as entertainment expenses. The assessee argued that 1/3rd of the entertainment expenses should be attributed to employees' participation and thus not disallowable under section 37(2) of the Act. The Assessing Officer disallowed the entire amount, and the CIT (Appeals) upheld this decision. The Tribunal referred to the Delhi High Court's decision in CIT v. Expo Machinery Ltd., which held that expenses on food and beverages for employees while entertaining clients should be excluded from disallowable entertainment expenses. The Tribunal found the assessee's claim that 1/3rd of the entertainment expenses were attributable to employees' participation to be just and fair. Therefore, it directed the Assessing Officer to consider 1/3rd of the entertainment expenses as attributable to employees' participation and not disallowable. 3. Deletion of Disallowance of Miscellaneous Expenses: The assessee claimed a deduction for miscellaneous expenses, which the Assessing Officer disallowed by 50% due to a lack of supporting material. The CIT (Appeals) deleted the disallowance, noting that the expenses were legitimate business expenses and had been certified by the auditors. The Tribunal reviewed the details of the expenses and found them to be legitimate business expenses. It noted that the Assessing Officer had not identified any specific disallowable items. The Tribunal concurred with the CIT (Appeals) and dismissed the revenue's appeal on this ground. Conclusion: The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, directing the revenue expenses incurred on or after 28-07-1994 to be allowed as a deduction and considering 1/3rd of the entertainment expenses as attributable to employees' participation. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, upholding the deletion of the disallowance of miscellaneous expenses.
|
