9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: The judgment involves appeals filed by the revenue against separate orders of the CIT (A)-II, Hyderabad for the assessment years 2002-03 and 2004-05, addressing issues related to sales commission, processing charges, treatment of other incomes, computation of deductions under sections 80HHC, 80IA, and 80IB, and treatment of non-compete fees.
Sales Commission Issue: The appeal addressed the addition of sales commission paid to foreign agents without TDS under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, citing Circular 786 dated 17-2-2000, which exempts commission paid directly to non-resident agents for services abroad from TDS. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that the case law cited by the Departmental Representative was not applicable as the payment was made directly to non-resident agents. Processing Charges Issue: The issue pertained to the treatment of processing charges in computing the deduction under section 80HHC of the Act. Both parties agreed that the matter was settled in favor of the department by the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of Ajanta Pharma Ltd., Vs ACIT, and others reported in 295 ITR 218. The Tribunal allowed the ground raised by the revenue based on this precedent. Treatment of Other Incomes Issue: This issue involved the treatment of foreign exchange gains and miscellaneous income while computing deductions under sections 80IA and 80IB of the Act. The Tribunal preferred to follow a decision in favor of the assessee from a previous assessment year, citing that the gain on foreign exchange arose from exports of goods and not on the purchase of capital goods. Consequently, the Tribunal confirmed the orders of the CIT(A) on this issue. Computation of Deductions Issue: The issue related to the computation of deductions under sections 80HHC, 80IA, and 80IB after reducing the claim of deduction under section 80IA and 80IB from the adjusted profit for 80HHC calculation. The Tribunal referred to a previous case to explain the legislative intent to prevent repetitive deductions on the same profit under different provisions. Following this guidance, the Tribunal directed the matter back to the assessing officer for proper computation of deductions, treating the revenue's ground as allowed for statistical purposes. Non-Compete Fees Issue: The final issue concerned the treatment of non-compete fees received by the assessee company as taxable capital gain. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, citing a decision from a previous case and the inapplicability of a specific provision introduced in the Income-tax Act in 2003 to the assessment year in question. Consequently, the ground raised by the revenue was dismissed. Conclusion: Both appeals filed by the revenue were treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal providing detailed reasoning and legal interpretations for each issue addressed in the judgment.
|
