9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
The judgment addresses Income-tax References Nos. 12 to 15 of 1985 concerning the assessment years 1974-75 and 1975-76. The issues revolve around the validity of reopening assessment proceedings and the quantum of disallowance regarding payment of commission. Validity of Reopening Assessment Proceedings: The assessee, a registered firm, derived income from the manufacture and sale of perforators. The Income-tax Officer reopened the assessment for the years 1974-75 and 1975-76 based on information from previous assessment years. The Tribunal upheld the validity of the reassessment proceedings, stating that they were not reopened merely due to a change of opinion but on the basis of new information indicating income had escaped assessment. The decision of the Tribunal was supported by legal precedents, including the requirement of "information" and "reason to believe" for reassessment under section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act. Quantum of Disallowance Regarding Commission Payment: The original assessment allowed commission payments to Kumar and Co., which were later found to be unjustified. The Income-tax Officer disallowed the claim in full during reassessment, which was partially upheld by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The Tribunal considered the reasonableness of the commission claim, ultimately allowing it at four per cent. based on the nature of services rendered. This decision was supported by a previous case law ruling that a commission of four per cent. was reasonable and justified. The Tribunal's decision was upheld by the High Court, leading to a favorable outcome for the assessee. In conclusion, the judgment addresses the validity of reopening assessment proceedings based on new information and the determination of a reasonable commission payment percentage, providing clarity on the legal aspects surrounding these issues.
|
