9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2011 (12) TMI 584 - HC - Income TaxTDS u/s 194C - Held that - In the present case the findings recorded by the CIT(Appeals) and Income Tax Appellate Tribunal are that the composite bills were not raised. The payments in question were towards the reimbursement of the exact amount which has been paid to the airlines towards freight charges. There is no finding that these agents deliberately separated/bifurcated the bills and service charges were independently paid or were included in the said bills. With regard to the second addition of 8, 84, 881/- the concurrent findings recorded by the CIT(Appeals) and ITAT are that the said payments were less than 50, 000/- to a single party and therefore TDS under Section 194C was not required to be deducted. The appellant has drawn our attention to the grounds of appeal in which it is stated that as per the books of accounts some of the parties were made payment of more than 50, 000/- in aggregate. Copy of the account book has not been filed along with the grounds of appeal. The names and details of the said parties are not indicated. It is not stated that this contention was raised before the Tribunal and copy of the account book was filed before the tribunal
Issues: Addition under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 - Failure to deduct TDS under Section 194C of the Act.
The judgment addresses two main issues related to additions made by the Assessing Officer under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 due to the failure of the assessee to deduct tax at source (TDS) under Section 194C of the Act. The CIT (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal both deleted the additions, leading to the first issue of an addition of Rs. 30,66,703. The appellate authorities concluded that the payment was not for service charges but for actual freight charges paid to the Airlines for goods export. They found that composite bills were not raised, and the payments were reimbursement for the exact amount paid to the airlines, with no evidence of deliberate separation of bills. The second issue involved an addition of Rs. 8,84,881, with the authorities determining that since the payments were less than Rs. 50,000 to a single party, TDS under Section 194C was not necessary. However, the appellant failed to provide supporting documentation or details of parties receiving payments exceeding Rs. 50,000 in aggregate. The first issue of Rs. 30,66,703 addition was based on the nature of payments made, with the authorities emphasizing the reimbursement of exact freight charges rather than service charges. The circular No.715 dated 8th August, 1995 was cited, highlighting the requirement for TDS deduction when composite bills for service and transportation charges are raised. However, since composite bills were not issued in this case, and the payments were for actual freight charges to airlines, the addition was deemed unjustified. The lack of evidence showing deliberate separation of bills further supported the deletion of this addition. On the second issue of Rs. 8,84,881 addition, the authorities considered the threshold of Rs. 50,000 to a single party for TDS deduction under Section 194C. The appellant's argument regarding payments exceeding Rs. 50,000 in aggregate lacked substantiating documentation, as the account book supporting the claim was not provided. The absence of details on parties receiving payments over the threshold and failure to present this contention before the Tribunal weakened the appellant's case. Consequently, the judgment dismissed the appeal, finding no merit in the arguments presented and refusing to award costs.
|
