9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: The judgment involves issues related to the computation of deduction under sections 10A and 10B of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2004-05.
Issue 1 - Treatment of certain charges in turnover calculation: The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s decision regarding the exclusion of link charges, interest charges, and per diem expenses from the export turnover and whether the same should also be excluded from the total turnover for computing deductions under sections 10A and 10B. The Tribunal referred to a Special Bench decision and held that amounts deducted from the export turnover should also be deducted from the total turnover for computing deductions under sections 10A and 10B. Consequently, the second ground raised by the Revenue was dismissed. Issue 2 - Disallowance under section 43B for working out eligible profits under section 10A: The Revenue contended that disallowances under section 43B should be considered for working out eligible profits under section 10A, while the assessee argued that such disallowances should not be excluded from deduction under section 10A as the profits were solely derived from the export of computer software. The Tribunal considered a similar issue in a previous case and held that unpaid PF contributions of employees cannot be considered as business income and should be treated as income from other sources, thereby disallowing exemption under section 10A. Consequently, the finding of the CIT(A) was reversed on this issue, and the ground of the Revenue was allowed. Issue 3 - Treatment of reimbursement of expenses in turnover calculation: The Cross Objection filed by the assessee challenged the inclusion of reimbursement of miscellaneous expenses and travel expenses in the total turnover. The assessee argued that these reimbursements were not part of the turnover as they were actual expenses incurred and reimbursed by Virtusa Corporation, USA. The Tribunal referred to previous decisions and held that reimbursement of miscellaneous expenses and travel expenses should be reduced from both export turnover and total turnover while computing deductions under section 10A. Therefore, the ground taken by the assessee in its Cross Objection was allowed. Conclusion: In conclusion, the appeal of the Revenue and the Cross Objection filed by the assessee were partly allowed based on the Tribunal's findings on the various issues raised in the judgment.
|
