9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
The judgment involves the rejection of the application for renewal of approval u/s 80G of the IT Act by the Director of IT (Exemptions) based on the alleged utilization of funds for the benefit of a particular religious community. Summary: The assessee society aimed to provide education aid to all deserving children, regardless of religion. The Director of IT (Exemptions) contended that funds were predominantly directed towards the Muslim community, while the society argued that assistance was extended to all communities. The Tribunal analyzed the object clause and beneficiary distribution, concluding that the society was not expressly for a particular community. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized that benefiting a section of the public suffices for charitable purposes. As the society did not restrict benefits to Muslims, the Tribunal overturned the Director's decision and directed renewal of approval u/s 80G of the Act. Detailed Analysis: The assessee society's appeal challenged the Director of IT (Exemptions)'s rejection of their renewal application u/s 80G of the IT Act, alleging funds were utilized for a specific religious community. The society's representative highlighted their objective of aiding deserving students from all backgrounds, with funds received from Indian and foreign donors. They argued that assistance was not limited to Muslims but extended to all communities, citing legal precedents emphasizing charitable purposes benefiting a section of the public. The Departmental Representative contended that the society primarily assisted the Muslim community, as evidenced by fee payments to predominantly Muslim students. Referring to legal judgments, they argued that when income is applied for a specific religious community, exemption is not warranted. The Departmental Representative supported the Director's decision to reject the renewal application. The Tribunal examined the object clause and beneficiary distribution, finding that the society's objective did not restrict benefits to any particular community. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized that charitable purposes need only benefit a section of the public. They reasoned that the society's assistance to predominantly Muslim students in a Muslim-majority area did not signify an express restriction to a particular community. As there was no written or oral expression limiting benefits to Muslims, the Tribunal overturned the Director's decision and directed renewal of approval u/s 80G of the Act, allowing the assessee's appeal.
|
