9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Challenge to penalty under section 271AA of the Income Tax Act 1961 for failure to maintain prescribed information and documents under section 92D of the Act.
Summary: The appellant, a company engaged in the business of machine tools, challenged a penalty imposed under section 271AA of the Income Tax Act for failure to comply with documentation requirements related to international transactions with associate enterprises. The Assessing Officer observed that the appellant failed to maintain prescribed information and documents under section 92D of the Act, leading to the penalty imposition. The appellant contended that the required documents were maintained, but the Assessing Officer disagreed. The penalty was confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), prompting the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal. During the hearing, the appellant argued against the penalty, citing case law and asserting that the penalty was unjustified. The Revenue, however, supported the penalty citing the CIT(A)'s order and distinguishing the case law presented by the appellant. After considering the arguments, assessment orders, and relevant provisions, the Tribunal found that the appellant had declared international transactions with its associate enterprises but had submitted the required Form 3CEB after the assessment finalization. The Tribunal noted that the penalty provision under section 271AA applies to failure to maintain documents, not delayed submission post-assessment. As there was no addition made in the assessment proceedings and no invocation of another penalty provision, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty was unwarranted. Consequently, the appellant's appeal was allowed, and the penalty was deleted. The Tribunal's decision was pronounced on February 14, 2013, in Chennai.
|
