9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Entitlement to claim deduction under section 35(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. Expenditure on scientific research related to the business and discharge of onus for claiming deduction. 3. Tribunal's decision on the nature of research being related to existing business. 4. Nexus of scientific research with the business in pesticides and other products. 5. Commencement of business in tissue culture technology-oriented plants. Analysis: Issue 1: The case involved a petition under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding the entitlement to claim a deduction under section 35(1) of the Act. The Revenue sought a direction to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to refer specific questions for preparation of the necessary statement of the case. Issue 2: The assessing authority initially disallowed the deduction claimed by the assessee for the assessment year 1986-87, citing lack of evidence that the business had commenced. The first appellate authority upheld this decision, emphasizing the absence of a tangible product resulting from the application of tissue-culture technology. The Tribunal, after a thorough investigation, found that the research undertaken by the assessee was indeed related to its existing business activities. Issue 3: The Tribunal examined the nature of the research conducted by the assessee and its connection to the business of dealing in pesticides, chemicals, and other estate stores. It concluded that the research in plant tissue-culture technology was directly related to the existing business activities of the assessee, as it aimed to produce genetically uniform plants essential for the business. Issue 4: The Tribunal further analyzed the statutory provisions of section 35(1) and found that the business in tissue-culture technology-oriented plants had commenced simultaneously with the research programs. It supported its conclusion with evidence of the purchase and sale of vegetation plants, highlighting the commencement of business activities from the acquisition of mother plants. Issue 5: In its detailed reasoning, the Tribunal referenced a decision of the Gujarat High Court regarding the commencement of business and emphasized that the purchase of mother plants in previous assessment years constituted the initiation of business activities. The Tribunal's thorough analysis led to the dismissal of the original petition, affirming the nexus between the scientific research conducted by the assessee and its business operations. In conclusion, the judgment highlighted the importance of establishing a clear connection between research activities and existing business operations to claim deductions under relevant tax provisions. The Tribunal's meticulous examination of the factual matrix and the business activities of the assessee played a crucial role in determining the eligibility for the claimed deduction under section 35(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
|
