9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Interpretation of depreciation rates for specific machinery under the Income-tax Rules. 2. Allowance of extra shift allowance on certain machinery. Analysis: The judgment pertains to two Income-tax Cases where the same assessee is involved. In the first case, the issue revolves around the classification of machinery for depreciation purposes. The assessee claimed depreciation at 15% on machinery valuing Rs. 3,04,748, considering it as automatic or semi-automatic machine tools. However, the lower authorities treated this machinery as general machinery, allowing depreciation at 10%. Additionally, the disallowance of extra shift allowance on specific machinery was upheld. The Commissioner of Income-tax and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal affirmed these decisions. In the second case, the assessee claimed depreciation at 15% on machinery valuing Rs. 10,42,634, arguing it falls under automatic or semi-automatic machine tools category. Contrary to the assessee's claim, the machinery was classified as electric machinery, making it eligible for depreciation at 10%. The Tribunal's decision was challenged by the assessee, leading to the present petition seeking a mandamus for reference of questions of law to the High Court. The High Court directed the Tribunal to refer specific questions of law related to the classification of machinery for depreciation and the allowance of extra shift allowance. The Court emphasized that the Tribunal should make references unless the matter is directly covered by a decision of the High Court or the Supreme Court. The judgment highlights the importance of legal interpretation in determining the applicability of depreciation rates and allowances under the Income-tax Rules.
|
