Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2016 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (8) TMI 1129 - AT - Income Tax


Issues involved:
1. Disallowance of interest paid to non-banking Finance (NBFC) company under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Detailed Analysis:
The appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-II, Jaipur regarding the disallowance of interest paid to a non-banking Finance (NBFC) company amounting to ?3,48,284. The AO disallowed this amount under section 40(a)(ia) as the TDS liability had arisen due to non-deduction of TDS on the interest payment. The assessee contended that the NBFCs had declared and paid taxes on the income received, and thus, the disallowance was not justified. However, the ld. CIT(A) upheld the disallowance citing a judgment of the Hon'ble Kerala High Court regarding the prospective application of the second proviso to section 40(a)(ia).

During the hearing, the assessee argued that the disallowance was unjustified as the NBFCs had declared and paid taxes on the interest received. The ld. CIT(A) had disregarded the provisions laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in previous cases. The assessee relied on various decisions to support their argument, emphasizing that the legislation should apply to pending assessments post the Supreme Court's decision in the Hindustan Coca Cola case. The ld. DR supported the lower authorities' order and referred to judgments of the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court and Hon'ble Kerala High Court.

The Tribunal considered the contentions of both parties and referred to relevant judgments. It highlighted the principle laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that if two reasonable constructions of a taxing provision are possible, the one favoring the assessee should be adopted. Citing conflicting decisions of different High Courts on the retrospectivity of the second proviso to section 40(a)(ia), the Tribunal noted a recent decision by the Coordinate Bench favoring retrospectivity. Consequently, the matter was remitted to the AO for verification of whether the recipient NBFCs had included the interest payment in their taxable income. If so, the disallowance was directed to be deleted, and the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates