Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1995 (3) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1995 (3) TMI 31 - HC - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Interpretation of delay in filing application under section 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Validity of the Commissioner's discretion in granting registration and its effect on exemption under section 12A for the assessment year.

Analysis:
The case involved an application under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, where the Revenue sought direction for reference to the High Court regarding questions arising from the Tribunal's order. The first question pertained to the correctness of the Tribunal's decision on condonation of delay in filing the application under section 12A. The Tribunal concluded that once the delay was condoned by the Commissioner, the application was deemed to have been made within the required timeframe. The second question revolved around the Commissioner's authority to impose conditions on granting registration and the subsequent entitlement to exemption under section 12A for the assessment year 1988-89.

The facts of the case revealed that the assessee was incorporated in December 1983 and applied for registration under section 12A in January 1988. The registration was granted in September 1988, with retrospective effect from January 1988. However, the benefit under section 11/12 of the Act was denied for the accounting year ending in December 1987 due to the delay in registration. The Tribunal held that if the Commissioner exercises discretion to admit a belated application, it equates to timely filing, and any conditions imposed by the Commissioner cannot restrict the effective date of registration.

The High Court, without delving into the case's merits, acknowledged the relevance of the questions raised by the Revenue regarding delay condonation and the Commissioner's authority. The Court deemed these questions as pure questions of law, necessitating interpretation of statutory provisions. Consequently, the High Court directed the Tribunal to refer the questions of law, along with the case statement, for further consideration, thereby allowing the Revenue's application.

In conclusion, the judgment focused on the legal interpretation of the provisions of the Income-tax Act, particularly concerning delay condonation in registration applications under section 12A and the Commissioner's discretion in granting registration and its subsequent implications on exemption benefits. The decision highlighted the significance of statutory construction in determining the legal consequences of administrative actions under the Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates