Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2015 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (3) TMI 1276 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment
2. Initiation of Penalty Proceedings
3. Levy of Interest under Sections 234B and 234C

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment:
The primary issue in this appeal concerns the Transfer Pricing adjustment related to the payment of management fees amounting to Rs. 7,54,58,373. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) did not accept this transaction as being at arm's length, stating that no benefit was availed by the assessee from such payments to its Associated Enterprises (AEs). The TPO's stance was that in the absence of a cost-benefit analysis, the payment of management fees was unwarranted. The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) upheld the TPO's adjustment.

The Tribunal referred to the judgment of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT-I Vs. Cushman and Wakefield (India) (P.) Ltd., which held that the TPO's authority is to determine the arm's length price (ALP) and not to assess whether the assessee derived any benefit from the services rendered by the AE. The High Court emphasized that the TPO cannot determine the ALP at 'nil' merely because the assessee did not derive any benefit from the services. This aspect is within the purview of the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

The Tribunal concluded that the TPO had overstepped by determining the ALP of the management fees at 'nil' due to perceived lack of benefit to the assessee. The matter was remanded back to the AO/TPO for fresh consideration, specifically to determine whether the assessee derived any benefit from the payment of management fees and if so, whether the fees were commensurate with comparable transactions.

2. Initiation of Penalty Proceedings:
The second issue raised by the assessee related to the initiation of penalty proceedings. The Tribunal dismissed this ground as premature and not maintainable at this stage.

3. Levy of Interest under Sections 234B and 234C:
The third issue concerned the levy of interest under Sections 234B and 234C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal noted that the levy of interest under these provisions is mandatory and consequential. Therefore, this ground was rejected.

Conclusion:
The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the Transfer Pricing issue being restored to the AO/TPO for de-novo consideration. The stay application was dismissed as infructuous since the appeal had been heard. The order was pronounced in open court on March 31, 2015.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates