9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Assessment of income from other sources and capital gains in the hands of a body of individuals under the Portuguese Civil Code. Analysis: The judgment pertains to the assessment year 1975-76, involving a married couple governed by the Portuguese Civil Code. The Income-tax Officer initially assessed their income as a body of individuals, which was challenged in appeal. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal both ruled that the income should be assessed separately in the hands of each spouse. The key question referred to the High Court was whether the income from other sources and capital gains should be assessed in the hands of the body of individuals or separately for each spouse. The High Court analyzed the provisions of the Portuguese Civil Code, specifically highlighting that under Goan customary law, both spouses have a fixed half share in income from dividends, interest, and capital gains. Referring to previous judgments, the court emphasized that income possessed by the communion of interest of husband and wife should be assessed in equal shares in the hands of each spouse individually. The court also cited cases where similar principles were applied to gift-tax assessments and income from business run by the communion. Furthermore, the court distinguished between income derived from investments held jointly by the spouses and income arising from business activities of the communion. It was established that income from investments, including interest, dividends, and capital gains, should be assessed separately for each spouse as individuals. The court also referenced a Supreme Court judgment regarding wealth-tax, emphasizing that joint rights in property due to marriage under the Portuguese Civil Code do not create an association of persons for tax purposes. Ultimately, the High Court concluded that the income from other sources and capital gains should be assessed separately for each spouse, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities. The judgment clarified that the assessment did not involve income from business activities of the communion, focusing solely on income from investments. The ruling was in favor of the assessees, with no order as to costs.
|
