Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2017 (4) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2017 (4) TMI 1249 - AT - Income TaxDeduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) disallowed - interest income and dividend income derived by the assessee from its shareholding in other co-operative societies - the assessee falls under the category of Primary Co-operative Bank as per definition in part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Held that - The facts being similar as in Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society 2015 (6) TMI 573 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT wherein held Section 80P(1) of the Act restricts the benefits of deduction of income of Cooperative Society to the extent it is earned by providing credit facility to its members. Therefore, to the extent the income earned is attributable to dealings with the non-members are concerned, the benefit of section 80P of the Act would not be available. In the above view of the matter, at the time when effect has been given to the order of this Court, the authorities under Act would restrict the benefit of deduction u/s 80P of the Act only to the extent that the same is earned by the appellant in carrying on its business of providing credit facilities to its members. Thus hold that the assessee is entitled to the benefit of deduction available u/s 80P of the Act. However, as held in the above judgement to the extent the income earned is attributable to dealings with non-members are concerned the benefit of section 80P of the Act would not be available to the assessee. In view of the above, the AO is directed to verify the same and pass a consequential order, if any.
Issues:
1. Allowance of deductions u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) and u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act. 2. Consideration of insertion of sec. 80P(4) and sub-clause (viia) to section 2(24) vide Finance Act, 2006. 3. Classification of the assessee as a 'Primary Co-operative Bank' under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. 4. Reliance on the decision of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in a specific case by the CIT(A). 5. Restoration of the AO's order and setting aside of the CIT(A)'s order. Analysis: 1. Allowance of deductions u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) and u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act: The appeal involved the question of allowing deductions to the assessee under sections 80P(2)(a)(i) and 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act. The AO had disputed the deductions based on the nature of activities carried out by the assessee, a Co-operative Credit Society, primarily involved in providing financial services, banking business, and credit facilities to its members. The CIT(A), however, allowed the deductions, considering precedents and holding the society eligible for the deductions under the mentioned sections. 2. Consideration of insertion of sec. 80P(4) and sub-clause (viia) to section 2(24) vide Finance Act, 2006: The AO raised concerns regarding the insertion of sec. 80P(4) and sub-clause (viia) to section 2(24) by the Finance Act, 2006, effective from 01.04.2007. However, the CIT(A) did not find these provisions as hindrances to granting the deductions under sections 80P(2)(a)(i) and 80P(2)(d) to the assessee. 3. Classification of the assessee as a 'Primary Co-operative Bank' under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949: The AO argued that the assessee fell under the category of a 'Primary Co-operative Bank' as per the definition in part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. However, the CIT(A) disagreed, considering the nature of the society's activities and its classification as a Cooperative Credit Society, thereby justifying the eligibility for deductions under the Income Tax Act. 4. Reliance on the decision of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in a specific case by the CIT(A): The CIT(A relied on various judgments, including the decision of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in a specific case, to support the allowance of deductions to the assessee. The CIT(A's decision was based on the interpretation of the nature of the society and its activities, aligning with the judicial precedents cited. 5. Restoration of the AO's order and setting aside of the CIT(A)'s order: The revenue appealed for the restoration of the AO's order and setting aside the CIT(A)'s decision. However, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, following the judgment of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court, granting the assessee the benefit of deductions under section 80P of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal directed the AO to verify the income earned from dealings with non-members and pass a consequential order accordingly.
|