Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2012 (2) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2012 (2) TMI 627 - AT - Service TaxInput Tax Credit - appellant case id that they have not availed credit during the period - Held that - Considering the fact that the applicant has not availed credit during the impugned period for which they are entitled, the liability of demand would reduce to ₹ 1.42 lakhs, approximately - matter remanded back to the original adjudicating authority to verify how much amount of credit is available and reduce the demand accordingly - appeal allowed by way of remand.
Issues:
Service tax demand confirmation, availing input service credit, waiver of pre-deposit, remand for verification of Cenvat credit availability. Service Tax Demand Confirmation: The judgment confirms a service tax demand of Rs. 12,63,598/- against the applicant for the period 10/09/2004 to 31/03/2009, along with interest and penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1944. Availing Input Service Credit: The applicant contended that they did not avail input service credit during the period in question. If considered admissible, the liability would reduce to approximately Rs. 1.42 lakhs. The applicant had already paid Rs. 3,07,093/- along with interest of Rs. 69,410/-, requesting a stay be granted. Waiver of Pre-Deposit: Considering that the applicant did not avail credit during the period, the liability would reduce to Rs. 1.42 lakhs. As the applicant had already paid a substantial amount, the tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit for the balance amount of service tax, interest, and penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1944, during the appeal's pendency. Remand for Verification of Cenvat Credit Availability: The tribunal observed that Cenvat credit was available to the appellants. Consequently, the matter was remanded back to the original adjudicating authority to determine the amount of credit available and adjust the demand accordingly. The appellant was directed to cooperate with the adjudicating authority for this purpose, with the remand being limited to this specific verification.
|