9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2016 (12) TMI 1670 - AT - Income TaxP.E. in India - accrual of income in India - invoking of section 115A r.w.s. 44DA - Held that - No infirmity in the order of the DRP in holding that the assessee company has no PE in India and therefore invoking of section 115A r.w.s. 44DA was not necessary. We accordingly uphold the order of the DRP and the grounds raised by the revenue are dismissed.
Issues:
1. Determination of taxable income based on TDS certificate discrepancy. 2. Existence of Permanent Establishment (PE) in India. 3. Taxability of receipts sourced from India. 4. Applicability of tax treaty provisions and exclusion clause. 5. Interpretation of taxability at a lower rate in case of PE existence. 6. Admissibility of deductions and lower tax rate under specific sections. 7. Consistency with previous Tribunal decisions on similar issues. Issue 1: Determination of taxable income based on TDS certificate discrepancy: The appeal filed by the Revenue challenged the order passed by the DRP, Pune for the Assessment Year 2010-11. The Assessing Officer noted a discrepancy between the income received by the assessee and the amount shown as taxable income based on the TDS certificate. Despite seeking clarification from the assessee, no response was received. Consequently, the Assessing Officer determined the taxable income at the TDS certificate amount and passed the draft order. The DRP, Pune directed the Assessing Officer to delete the demand, leading to the Revenue's appeal. Issue 2: Existence of Permanent Establishment (PE) in India: The Revenue contended that the assessee controlled and managed Indian subsidiaries, constituting a PE in India. However, the DRP, Pune held that the assessee did not have a PE in India, relying on previous Tribunal decisions in the assessee's favor for A.Y. 2007-08 and 2009-10. The Tribunal upheld the DRP's decision, stating that the issue had already been adjudicated and dismissed the Revenue's grounds, emphasizing the absence of any contrary material. Issue 3: Taxability of receipts sourced from India and Applicability of tax treaty provisions: The Revenue argued that even if a PE existed, if the receipts sourced from India were not attributable to the PE, the case would fall under Art.12(2), and the exclusion clause in Art.12(5) would not trigger Art.7 of the treaty for rate purposes. The Tribunal, citing previous decisions, reiterated that unless the receipts were attributable to the PE, taxability under Art.7 would not apply, emphasizing the need for an effective nexus between the PE and the income. Issue 4: Interpretation of taxability at a lower rate in case of PE existence: The Tribunal clarified that taxability at a lower rate under specific sections would only apply if the royalties and fees for technical services were demonstrated to have a live economic nexus with the PE. The provisions of s. 44D and s. 115A would be invoked only if the income was attributable to the PE, ensuring that the entire business receipts sourced from India were taxable under Art.7. Issue 5: Admissibility of deductions and lower tax rate under specific sections: The Tribunal emphasized that deductions and lower tax rates under relevant sections would only be applicable when there was positive income from royalties and fees for technical services attributable to the PE. The limitation on deductions and lower rates would not be relevant if there were no receipts attributable to the PE, ensuring a proper profit attribution exercise. Issue 6: Consistency with previous Tribunal decisions on similar issues: The Tribunal, maintaining consistency with past decisions, upheld the DRP's order, stating that in the absence of any contrary material, the assessee did not have a PE in India for the Assessment Year 2010-11. The grounds raised by the Revenue were dismissed, aligning with the Tribunal's previous rulings in the assessee's favor. This detailed analysis of the judgment addresses the various issues involved, highlighting the legal interpretations and conclusions reached by the Tribunal based on the facts and arguments presented.
|
