9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of depreciation on fixed assets. 2. Disallowance of deduction under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. 3. Treatment of income from the sale of plots as business income versus long-term capital gain. Analysis: 1. Disallowance of Depreciation on Fixed Assets: The Revenue challenged the deletion of an addition of Rs. 3,92,805/- made by the AO on account of disallowance of depreciation, arguing that the fixed assets were not put to use for business purposes. The AO disallowed the depreciation because the equipment and software were purchased at the end of the financial year and were not installed or put to use, and the payments remained largely unpaid, reflecting the assets as capital work in progress. The assessee contended that the AO's disallowance was based on assumptions without independent inquiry. The equipment was received earlier than the end of the financial year, and the ERP system's sales module was operational by March 2005. The categorization as work in progress was for financial statement purposes only, and the usability of the asset is the sole criterion for depreciation, not the timing of payment. The ld.CIT(A) agreed with the assessee, emphasizing that substance should prevail over form and that usability of the asset is the key criterion for depreciation. The Tribunal upheld this view, noting that the invoices and the operational status of the ERP system indicated that the assets were indeed put to use. 2. Disallowance of Deduction under Section 80G: The Revenue contested the deletion of a disallowance of Rs. 62,500/- under Section 80G. The AO had already considered the gross total income before allowing the deduction under Section 80G and then added Rs. 62,500/- to the total income, which the ld.CIT(A) found uncalled for. The Tribunal agreed with the ld.CIT(A), noting that the donation of Rs. 75,000/- was already added back to the net profit in the computation of total income, and thus, the amount could not be separately added again. 3. Treatment of Income from Sale of Plots: The Revenue argued that income from the sale of plots should be treated as business income rather than long-term capital gain. The AO treated the sale of plots as business income and enhanced the value of certain plots based on Section 50C. The assessee argued that the land was purchased for installing a factory, and due to urbanization, it was converted into plots for better capital appreciation. The sale of plots was an isolated activity, and the land was always shown as a fixed asset, not stock in trade. The ld.CIT(A) agreed, noting that the sale of land was a capital transaction, not a business activity, and Section 50C was not applicable as the plots sold through agreement were not registered. The Tribunal upheld the ld.CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing that the intention behind the purchase and the long-term holding of the land indicated it was a capital asset. The Tribunal also noted that the provisions of Section 50C were not applicable to sales made through agreements before the amendment including the word "assessable." Conclusion: The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the ld.CIT(A)'s decisions on all three issues. The depreciation on fixed assets was allowed, the disallowance under Section 80G was deleted, and the income from the sale of plots was treated as long-term capital gain rather than business income.
|
