9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Appeal against dismissal of petition for quashing criminal proceedings under Sections 406, 498A read with 114 IPC pending before trial court.
Issue 1: Quashing of criminal proceedings The appellant, husband, and wife were accused of unreasonable dowry demands and misbehavior by their daughter-in-law. The complaint was filed after nine years of marriage, alleging mistreatment and demand for dowry. The High Court refused to quash the complaint, stating it had sufficient material to proceed. The appellant's counsel argued that the complaint was vague and lacked specific allegations against the appellants. The Supreme Court observed that the complaint primarily targeted the deceased husband, with vague references to the appellants. The court emphasized the need for specific details of offenses committed by each accused. As the deceased husband was the main focus of the allegations and had already passed away, continuing the prosecution against the elderly parents would be an abuse of process. The court set aside the High Court judgment and quashed the order of cognizance under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Issue 2: Lack of specific allegations The complaint lacked specific details regarding the alleged offenses by the appellants. It failed to specify the role played by each accused in the offenses. The court noted that the complaint did not clearly attribute any offense under Section 498A IPC to the present appellants. Moreover, the absence of crucial details such as dates of events and specific actions by the appellants weakened the case against them. The court highlighted that the complaint's vagueness made it unjust to continue the prosecution against the elderly parents based on unclear accusations. Separate Judgment: The Supreme Court, comprising V.S. Sirpurkar and Deepak Verma, JJ., allowed the appeal and quashed the criminal proceedings against the appellants under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
|
