9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
The judgment involves the interpretation of whether subscription amounts received by a charitable trust constitute "voluntary contributions" under section 12 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and are liable to be included in the total income of the trust. Additionally, it addresses the application of section 11 to the facts of the case and the characterization of the subscription amounts as income. Interpretation of "Voluntary Contributions": The case pertains to the trustees of a public charitable trust receiving subscription amounts from members during the assessment years 1973-74 and 1974-75. The question is whether these subscription fees qualify as "voluntary contributions" under section 12 of the Act. The Tribunal considered the amounts as voluntary contributions and included them in the total income of the trust. However, the counsel for the assessee argued that subscription fees cannot be equated to voluntary contributions without any consideration, emphasizing the need for a gift or gratuitous payment. The court referred to the old and amended provisions of section 12, maintaining the essence of "voluntary contribution" unchanged. Legal Precedents and Interpretation: The counsel cited the High Court of Madhya Pradesh's ruling on "voluntary contribution," emphasizing the need for contributions to be made willingly and without compulsion, gifted or given gratuitously. The court differentiated between membership fees or subscriptions to a society or trust, stating that such payments do not qualify as voluntary contributions as they involve consideration. Legal precedents highlighted the distinction between payments made for value received and gifts made from disinterested motives for the benefit of others. Court's Decision and Conclusion: The court agreed with the assessee's argument, ruling that the membership and subscription amounts received by the trust cannot be categorized as "voluntary contributions" under section 12. Consequently, the entire income of the trust was exempted under section 11. Question No. 1 was answered in favor of the assessee, concluding that the subscription amounts were not to be included in the trust's total income. As a result, the court declined to answer question No. 2. The reference was disposed of without costs. Judge's Decision: The judgment was delivered by D. R. DHANUKA J., with the court ruling in favor of the assessee, holding that the subscription amounts did not constitute voluntary contributions under section 12 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
|
