2015 (10) TMI 2714 - AT - Income Tax

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - tax was levied under the provisions of MAT under section 115JB on assessee - Held that - As decided in the case of CIT Vs. M/s Vardhman Acrylics Limited 2014 (8) TMI 1144 - PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT the assessment having been made under the provisions of MAT under section 115JB of the Act, penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied on additions and disallowances made in regular income. Since there were brought forward losses and depreciation, the return was filed declaring the income under the MAT and even after appeal effect, the income assessed under section 115JB of the Act, we find that the assessee being assessed under section 115JB of the Act, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied. - Decided in favour of assessee

Summary

Issues:
Appeal against penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for assessment year 2005-06.

Analysis:
The judgment by Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh involved cross-appeals against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty was imposed by the Assessing Officer on various additions and disallowances made during the assessment. The CIT (Appeals) partially relieved the assessee by deleting the penalty on certain additions while confirming it on others. The appeals were filed by both the assessee and the Department against the respective decisions. The key contention raised was the applicability of penalty under section 271(1)(c) in cases where tax was assessed under section 115JB of the Act due to unabsorbed losses and depreciation from earlier years.

The assessee argued that since the tax was assessed under the Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) provisions of section 115JB, penalties under section 271(1)(c) could not be levied on additions and disallowances made in regular income. The assessee relied on the judgment of the Punjab & Haryana High Court and the Delhi High Court to support this argument. The Department did not counter these submissions. The Tribunal considered the submissions, reviewed the lower authorities' findings, and examined the relevant documents. It noted that the regular income was computed as nil after appeal proceedings, and the income was assessed under section 115JB due to brought forward losses and depreciation.

The Tribunal referred to the Punjab & Haryana High Court's decision in a similar case, which stated that penalties cannot be imposed based on additions or disallowances made under regular provisions when income is assessed under section 115JB. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the penalty levied by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. As a result, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed. The judgment was pronounced on October 12, 2015, by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh.