2009 (8) TMI 1237 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues involved: Determination of whether the business of coating and lamination of Alluminium Foil for pharmaceutical packaging constitutes a manufacturing activity for the purpose of claiming benefit under Section 80-IB of the Income Tax Act.

Summary:
The case involved a dispute regarding the classification of the process of coating and lamination of Alluminium Foil for pharmaceutical packaging as a manufacturing activity for tax benefits under Section 80-IB of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer initially rejected the claim, but the CIT(A) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal later upheld the claim. The key question was whether the conversion process resulted in the creation of a new and distinct product. The CIT(A) described the process as producing a new end product different from the original aluminum foil, similar to a previous Supreme Court ruling. The respondent provided a detailed chart outlining the process involved in producing Blister Foil and pharmaceutical foil from raw aluminum foil. The process included steps like shellac wash, VMCH coating, and slitting to meet the specific requirements of the pharmaceutical industry. The court found that the process, involving specialized machinery, was essential for pharmaceutical packaging and resulted in a product distinct from plain aluminum foil. Consequently, the court affirmed the lower authorities' decision, concluding that the activity qualified as a manufacturing process for tax benefits under Section 80-IB.