9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Taxability of income from rubber estates in Malaysia. 2. Relevance of separate establishment in India for Malaysian rubber estates. 3. Inclusion of Malaysian income for rate purposes. 4. Requirement of certificate from Malaysian Revenue authorities for double income-tax relief. 5. Taxability of capital gains arising in Malaysia. Summary: Issue 1: Taxability of Income from Rubber Estates in Malaysia - Case Reference: Tax Case No. 264 of 1983. - Judgment: The court held that "the income derived from the rubber estates in Malaysia cannot be included in the total income of the assessee and assessed to tax in India under the Income-tax Act, 1961." This was based on the agreement for avoidance of double taxation between India and Malaysia. Issue 2: Relevance of Separate Establishment in India for Malaysian Rubber Estates - Case Reference: Tax Case No. 264 of 1983. - Judgment: The court affirmed that "the finding of the Tribunal that the assessee does not maintain a separate establishment in India in respect of the rubber estates in Malaysia is based upon relevant materials and facts." This finding is necessary for adjudicating that the income from Malaysian rubber estates is taxable only in Malaysia. Issue 3: Inclusion of Malaysian Income for Rate Purposes - Case References: Tax Case Nos. 789 and 790 of 1984. - Judgment: The court held that "the Malaysian income cannot be subjected to tax in India" and that this decision is in accordance with the double taxation avoidance agreement between India and Malaysia. Issue 4: Requirement of Certificate from Malaysian Revenue Authorities for Double Income-Tax Relief - Case References: Tax Cases Nos. 840 and 841 of 1984. - Judgment: The court ruled that "the Appellate Tribunal was correct in holding and also directing the Income-tax Officer to allow the benefit of double income-tax relief without insisting upon the production of a certificate from the Malaysian Revenue authorities." Issue 5: Taxability of Capital Gains Arising in Malaysia - Case References: Tax Case Nos. 135 of 1985 and 72 of 1987. - Judgment: The court affirmed that "the capital gains arising in Malaysia cannot be subjected to tax in India" and that this decision is in accordance with the double taxation avoidance agreement between India and Malaysia. Conclusion: The High Court of Madras consistently ruled in favor of the assessees, holding that income derived from Malaysia, whether from rubber estates, business profits, dividends, interest, or capital gains, is not taxable in India under the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to the provisions of the double taxation avoidance agreement between India and Malaysia. The court also ruled that the production of a certificate from Malaysian Revenue authorities is not necessary for claiming double income-tax relief.
|
