9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2010 (5) TMI 506 - AT - Income TaxBusiness income or Other sources - Business premises was let out to M/s. Sai Service Station Ltd. and M/s. Sai Automobile Sales & Services Pvt. Ltd. and as per the agreements entered into on 24-6-2002 royalty was payable to the assessee-company @ Rs.1, 70, 000/- per month from each of the above two companies and the period of agreement was 3 years from 24-6-2002 - Upon perusal of the agreements and other details AO observed that the so-called royalty income is assessable to tax as income from other sources - Under the peculiar circumstances of the case the rule of consistency or res judicata cannot be applied to the facts on hand and the issue has to be decided independently - Held that the income earned by the assessee is assessable to tax under the head income from other sources and not as business income Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - receipt of loan of Rs. 11, 10, 000 - in view of decision of Hon ble Bombay High Court in the case of Universal Medicare Private Ltd. (2010 -TMI - 76961 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT) issue decided in favor of assessee In the result appeal filed by the assessee partly allowed
Issues Involved:
1. Classification of 'conduction royalty amount' and other income as 'income from other sources' versus 'profits and gains from business'. 2. Assessment of loan received as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Classification of 'Conduction Royalty Amount' and Other Income: The primary issue in this appeal was whether the 'conduction royalty amount' of Rs. 40,80,000/- and other income of Rs. 1,63,310/- should be classified as 'income from other sources' or 'profits and gains from business'. The assessee-company, engaged in the business of running a Hyundai Authorized Service Station, temporarily suspended its operations as the directors went abroad. The business premises were let out to two companies under 'business conducting agreements' dated 24-6-2002, with a royalty payable to the assessee at Rs. 1,70,000/- per month from each company. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) classified this income as 'income from other sources' on the grounds that the assessee had no intention of carrying on its own business. The assessee argued that the income should be considered as 'profits and gains from business', emphasizing that the lease was temporary and aimed at exploiting commercial assets to revive the business later. The ITAT noted that in the assessment year 2003-2004, the Tribunal had reversed the Assessing Officer's decision, treating the income as 'business income', and the High Court had dismissed the Revenue's appeal. However, upon reviewing the facts, it was found that the agreements were extended beyond the initial three years to 30th June 2011, indicating no intention to revive the business. The ITAT concluded that the income should be assessed under 'income from other sources', upholding the CIT(A)'s order. 2. Assessment of Loan Received as Deemed Dividend: The second issue concerned the assessment of a loan of Rs. 11,10,000/- as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee contended that this should not be treated as deemed dividend, citing the Bombay High Court's decision in the case of Universal Medicare Private Ltd. and the ITAT, Mumbai Special Bench's decision in ACIT v. Bhaumik Colour P. Ltd., which supported their position. The learned DR admitted the applicability of these precedents to the present case. Consequently, the ITAT accepted the assessee's plea and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 11,10,000/-. Conclusion: The appeal was partly allowed. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s classification of the 'conduction royalty amount' and other income as 'income from other sources'. However, the assessment of the loan as deemed dividend was reversed, directing the deletion of the addition. The order was pronounced on 31st May 2010.
|
