2010 (11) TMI 245 - AT - Service Tax

Refund claim - Refund of service tax paid on input service used for providing output service, which is exported - The refund has been denied to them by the authorities below on the ground that they had taken registration on 30-11-2007, whereas their claim for refund is for the period prior to that date - Person liable for paying the service tax shall make an application to the concerned Superintendent of Service Tax for registration - The appellants have exported their entire output service, they were not required to pay the service tax and hence the law does not mandate them to take registration compulsorily. Held that the appellants have exported their entire output service, they were not required to pay the service tax and hence the law does not mandate them to take registration compulsorily - The penalty for not taking registration is only Rs. 1,000/ - The appellants cannot be denied the refund of over Rs. 3.5 lakhs of tax paid on input service on the ground of not taking a registration earlier - Hence, the impugned orders passed by the authorities below are set aside and the matter is remanded to the original authority for considering the refund claim and sanctioning the same.

Issues:
1. Denial of refund claim based on delay in registration.
2. Interpretation of provisions regarding registration under the Finance Act, 1994 and Service Tax Rules, 1994.
3. Applicability of registration requirement to persons not liable to pay service tax.
4. Penalty for not taking registration under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994.

Analysis:
1. The main issue in this case was the denial of a refund claim by the authorities based on the delay in registration by the appellants. The advocate for the appellant argued that since the output service was entirely exported and no service tax was payable on it, there was no requirement for registration under the statute. The delay in registration should not justify denying the refund claim.

2. The Tribunal analyzed the relevant provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 and the Service Tax Rules, 1994. Section 69 of the Finance Act, 1994 mandates that every person liable to pay service tax must apply for registration within the specified time. Rule 4(1) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 further clarifies the requirement for registration within thirty days of the levy of service tax or commencement of providing taxable services. The Tribunal noted that the provisions regarding payment of service tax also apply to refund claims.

3. The Tribunal interpreted that only persons liable to pay service tax are required to apply for registration. Since the appellants exported their entire output service and were not liable to pay service tax on it, they were not mandated to register compulsorily. Additionally, the penalty for not taking registration under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 is minimal. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that denial of the refund claim solely based on the delay in registration was unjustified.

4. Considering the above analysis, the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders of the lower authorities and remanded the matter to the original authority for reconsideration of the refund claim. The appellants were granted the opportunity to present their defense before a fresh decision is made. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed by way of remand, ensuring a fair consideration of the refund claim without the undue emphasis on the registration delay issue.

← Previous Next →