9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2010 (1) TMI 696 - HC - Income TaxCIT disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80IA after revising the order u/s 263 - Since the assessee firm was held eligible for deduction under Section 80IA, the rate declared by it at such a margin was examined by the Assessing Officer. A sum of Rs.1,72,985/- was credited on account of interest in the profit and loss account, which was not held to be eligible for deduction under Section 80IA and return submitted by the assessee was accepted, except the above deduction which was disallowed on account of interest. - CIT found the order of AO erroneous and prejudicial to revenue and directed the AO to pass fresh order - ITAT canceleld the order of CIT and restored the order of AO - Held that - it is clear that each aspect of the case had been considered by the CIT in coming to its findings. It was clearly observed that there was low consumption of electricity and details of consumption of electricity in units per month were considered and it was observed that in view of the manufacturing turn over of over 1.33 crore, the expenditure of Rs.1,04,680/- is considered highly inadequate. The observation was also made in regard to employment of less than 10/20 workers and the assessee firm claimed to have employed 14 persons during the financial year 1999-2000, out of which 3 persons were working exclusively as office staff. Thus, it was concluded that 11 persons could be held to be engaged for manufacturing process and keeping in view of the nature of the manufacturing process, as claimed by the assessee, and its turn over, the expenses were considered very much on the lower side - Order of CIT u/s 263 restored.
Issues:
1. Appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. 2. Validity of the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax. 3. Powers of the Commissioner under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. 4. Consideration of various aspects in the assessment process. 5. Comparison of findings by the Commissioner and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. 6. Application of legal precedents in similar cases. Issue 1: Appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal The appellant filed an appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which allowed the appeal filed by the assessee and set aside the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) ordering fresh assessment by the Assessing Officer. The ITAT accepted the appeal against the CIT's order, leading to the Revenue filing the present appeal. Issue 2: Validity of the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax The CIT, under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, set aside the Assessing Officer's order as erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. The CIT directed the Assessing Officer to frame a fresh assessment after considering all necessary evidence and facts of the case. The ITAT canceled the CIT's order, leading to the present appeal by the Revenue. Issue 3: Powers of the Commissioner under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act The main issue revolved around the powers of the CIT under Section 263 of the Act and whether the ITAT was correct in not providing detailed findings on each issue raised by the CIT. The CIT's powers were considered wide enough and were rightly exercised in this case, as argued by the Revenue. Issue 4: Consideration of various aspects in the assessment process The CIT considered various aspects such as the high gross profit rate declared by the assessee, low electricity consumption, and employment details. The CIT concluded that a fresh assessment was necessary due to the discrepancies found in the return submitted by the assessee. Issue 5: Comparison of findings by the Commissioner and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal The ITAT set aside the CIT's order without providing detailed findings on the observations made by the CIT. The ITAT's decision was deemed incorrect as it did not address the concerns raised by the CIT regarding the assessment process. Issue 6: Application of legal precedents in similar cases Legal precedents such as the case of M/s The Green World Corporation were cited to support the CIT's power to advise the Assessing Officer to reopen assessments for earlier years. The decision in Malabar Industrial Co.Ltd. was also referenced to highlight the importance of interpreting the term 'prejudicial to Revenue' in Section 263 of the Act. In conclusion, the High Court accepted the appeal filed by the Revenue, setting aside the ITAT's order and restoring the CIT's order for a fresh assessment by the Assessing Officer. The decision was based on the detailed consideration of various aspects in the assessment process and the correct application of legal precedents in similar cases.
|
