9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2011 (9) TMI 137 - HC - Income TaxReassessment under section 147 / 148 - Web site services - Domain name registrations and Web Hosting Services - Claim of deduction u/s 80HHE and u/s 10A - Assessing Officer for reopening the assessment are that (i) The activities of a domain registry do not fall into the category of IT enabled services which necessitate a value addition. - Held that - That clearly is impermissible in the facts of this case which are clearly indicative of a mere change of opinion without the existence of any tangible material to reopen the assessment. decided in favour of Assessee.
Issues Involved:
1. Validity of reopening assessments for Assessment Years 2006-07 and 2007-08. 2. Whether the reopening is based on a mere change of opinion. 3. The impact of prior assessments and appeals on the current reopening. 4. Interpretation of Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 5. The requirement of "tangible material" for reopening assessments. Detailed Analysis: 1. Validity of Reopening Assessments for Assessment Years 2006-07 and 2007-08: The Assessing Officer issued notices dated 18 March 2011 to reopen assessments for the Assessment Years 2006-07 and 2007-08. The Petitioner challenged these notices under Article 226 of the Constitution, questioning the validity of the action initiated by the Assessing Officer. The reasons furnished for reopening included the assertion that the Petitioner's domain registration activities did not qualify as IT-enabled services or web-site services, thus disqualifying them from deductions under Section 10A. 2. Whether the Reopening is Based on a Mere Change of Opinion: The Petitioner argued that the reopening was based on a mere change of opinion, which is impermissible. The Supreme Court in CIT v. Kelvinator of India Ltd. [2010] 320 ITR 561/187 Taxman 312 held that reopening based on a mere change of opinion is not allowed. The Assessing Officer's reasons for reopening did not introduce any new or tangible material, but rather revisited previously considered facts, thus constituting a change of opinion. 3. The Impact of Prior Assessments and Appeals on the Current Reopening: The Petitioner had previously been allowed deductions under Section 10A for Assessment Years 2002-03 and 2003-04 after detailed consideration by the Commissioner (Appeals). These decisions attained finality as the Revenue did not challenge them. The Petitioner was also allowed deductions for subsequent years (2004-05 to 2007-08). The reopening of assessments for 2006-07 and 2007-08 was partly based on an assessment for 2008-09, where no deduction under Section 10A was claimed due to a business loss. The court noted that the Assessing Officer's comments on the 2008-09 assessment were not relevant for reopening earlier years' assessments. 4. Interpretation of Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 10A(1) provides a deduction from the profits and gains derived from the export of articles or things or computer software for ten consecutive assessment years. The term 'computer software' includes services notified by the CBDT, such as 'Web-site Services'. The Commissioner (Appeals) had previously determined that the Petitioner's domain registration and web hosting services qualified as 'Web-site Services', thus entitling them to deductions under Section 10A. 5. The Requirement of "Tangible Material" for Reopening Assessments: The court emphasized that the power to reopen assessments under Section 148 requires "reason to believe" that income has escaped assessment, which must be based on tangible material. The Assessing Officer cannot use this power to review an earlier determination without new material. The court found that the reopening in this case lacked any new tangible material and was simply a change in the Assessing Officer's opinion. Conclusion: The court concluded that the reopening of assessments for Assessment Years 2006-07 and 2007-08 was impermissible as it was based on a mere change of opinion without any new tangible material. The notices dated 18 March 2011 issued by the Assessing Officer were set aside, and the rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.
|
