9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Interpretation of provisions of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 regarding treatment of cinema theatre as 'plant' or 'office premises' under section 40(3)(vi), Finance Act, 1983 and retrospective operation of amendment by Finance Act, 1988.
Interpretation of cinema theatre as 'plant' or 'office premises': The court considered a previous case where a cinema theatre was held to be 'plant' for the purpose of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and applied the same reasoning to the Wealth-tax Act. It was concluded that a cinema theatre should be treated as 'plant' or 'office premises' under section 40(3)(vi), Finance Act, 1983, excluding it from taxable assets. Retrospective operation of amendment by Finance Act, 1988: The amendment introduced in 1988 excluded cinema houses from taxable assets under section 40(3)(vi) of the Finance Act, 1983. The court analyzed the legislative intent behind the amendment, emphasizing on curbing tax avoidance and providing incentives for growth. It was held that the amendment was curative and declaratory of the existing law, aiming to exclude unproductive assets from taxation. The court referred to legal principles supporting retroactive application of curative statutes and concluded that the amendment had retrospective operation for the assessment years 1984-85 and 1985-86. Conclusion: The court answered both questions in favor of the assessee, interpreting the provisions to exclude cinema theatres from taxable assets and affirming the retrospective operation of the amendment by the Finance Act, 1988.
|
