2011 (7) TMI 588 - AT - Income Tax

Sundry credit balance written back in the post tonnage regime prior period expenses written back provisions for expenses written back - can these items be separately taxed under section 41(1)? - Held that - AO has wrongly made an addition u/s 41(1) on the ground that these do not relate to core shipping activity as write back of these items is to be considered as income from core activity as in a going concern, such write backs and making of supplementary provisions takes place. AO cannot take recourse to sections 28 to 43C, when there is no other activity or business carried on by the company, other than business of operating qualifying ships. Period prior to pre-tonnage scheme resulting in reduction in taxable income then the write back those expenses in the current year when tonnage tax scheme applies, results in a miss-match is devoid of merit for the reason that there are other provisions such as section 43B - in favour of assessee. Interest on loan given to employees for vehicle and computers - income from core activities OR income from other sources - Held that - As decided in CIT v/s Lok Holdings 2008 (1) TMI 365 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT the interest in question cannot be compared with the interest on surplus funds parked in a bank. Loans were advanced to the employees involved in the core activity of an organisation and when certain income is derived form such activity, the same is taxable under the head Income From Business as it is expected that the assessee does not have any other business other than business of operating qualifying ships - in favour of assessee. Container related costs and detention charges - income from incidental activity or from core activity - Held that - When it is accepted that this receipt is nothing but recovery of cost, it would not be open for the Assessing Officer to bring to tax the gross receipt without eliminating the expenditure incurred for earning this income. If this receipt is to be treated as income from incidental activities, then the relatable cost is also to be excluded and only net income considered. As it is a mere reimbursement, there is no income element - in favour of assessee. Allocation of administrative expenditure to income - admittedly assessable under the head Other Sources - Held that - As the expenditure being claim by the assessee cannot be said to have been laid down or expended wholly and exclusively for the purpose of making or earning such income, the finding of the Revenue authorities are upheld in this regard. AO has rightly held that the assessee would not have incurred the expenditure claimed for earning income & the estimation of Rs. 1,00,000 by AO is reasonable - against assessee.

Issues Involved:
1. Classification of income under the tonnage tax scheme.
2. Taxability of write-back of sundry creditors, prior period expenses, and excess provisions.
3. Classification and taxability of miscellaneous receipts.
4. Classification and taxability of insurance receipts.
5. Classification and taxability of service tax refunds.
6. Classification of interest income on loans given to employees.
7. Classification of income from container-related costs and detention charges.
8. Allocation of administrative expenditure to income assessable under "Other Sources."
9. Determination of total turnover from core activities.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Classification of Income Under the Tonnage Tax Scheme:
The assessee, engaged in the business of merchant shipping, opted for the tonnage tax scheme under Chapter XII-G of the Income Tax Act. This scheme allows income from the operation of qualifying ships to be taxed on a presumptive basis, excluding other provisions of sections 28 to 43C of the Act. The income from core activities and incidental activities was classified and taxed accordingly. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions to the income, which the assessee contested, leading to the appeal.

2. Taxability of Write-back of Sundry Creditors, Prior Period Expenses, and Excess Provisions:
The AO added the write-back of sundry creditors, prior period expenses, and excess provisions under section 41(1), arguing they do not relate to core shipping activity. The assessee contended that section 115VA excludes sections 28 to 43C, including section 41(1), thus such additions were not warranted. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee, stating that the write-back of these items should be considered as income from core activities. The segregation of pre-tonnage and post-tonnage scheme periods was deemed impermissible, and the addition under section 41(1) was disallowed.

3. Classification and Taxability of Miscellaneous Receipts:
The assessee disputed the findings of the Revenue authorities regarding miscellaneous receipts, insurance receipts, and service tax refunds. However, since there was no tax impact in the year under consideration, these grounds were deemed academic and not adjudicated separately.

4. Classification and Taxability of Insurance Receipts:
Similar to miscellaneous receipts, the issue of insurance receipts was considered academic due to no tax impact in the year under consideration.

5. Classification and Taxability of Service Tax Refunds:
The issue of service tax refunds was also deemed academic for the same reason as above.

6. Classification of Interest Income on Loans Given to Employees:
The interest income from loans given to employees for vehicles and computers was contested. The AO classified this as "Income From Other Sources," but the Tribunal held that such loans were part of the business activity and should be treated as business income from core activities.

7. Classification of Income from Container-Related Costs and Detention Charges:
The AO classified income from container-related costs and detention charges as incidental activities. The Tribunal disagreed, stating that these were reimbursements of costs and not separate income. Thus, they should not be taxed as incidental activities.

8. Allocation of Administrative Expenditure to Income Assessable Under "Other Sources":
The assessee's claim of allocating administrative expenditure to income assessable under "Other Sources" was deemed excessive and incorrect. The Tribunal upheld the AO's estimation of Rs. 1,00,000 as reasonable and dismissed the assessee's claim.

9. Determination of Total Turnover from Core Activities:
The assessee argued that income from the sale of ships should be considered as income from core activities. The Tribunal held that such income is taxable under "Capital Gains" and does not fall within the ambit of sections 28 to 43C. Thus, it cannot be considered part of the total turnover for core activities.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal, disallowing the addition under section 41(1) and treating certain incomes as core activities. However, it upheld the AO's findings on the allocation of administrative expenditure and the classification of income from the sale of ships. The decision emphasized the comprehensive and exclusive nature of the tonnage tax scheme under Chapter XII-G.

← Previous Next →