9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2011 (11) TMI 356 - HC - VAT and Sales TaxSales Tax on Cotton Yarn - non fixing of stage of tax - that there is no notification in the official Gazette by the Chief Commissioner and therefore, the vital pre requisite of Section 15 of the Central Sales Tax, namely, that the tax shall not be levied at more than one stage, has not been satisfied in respect of turnover of the cotton yarn. - in view of the clear decision of the Supreme Court in the case of M/s Govind Saran Ganga Saran (1985 -TMI - 40041 - SUPREME Court) itself, decided in favor of assessee.
Issues:
1. Imposition of sales tax on cotton yarn under Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 2. Compliance with law regarding tax imposition without fixing a stage 3. Conformity with Section 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 4. Tax imposition on cotton yarn declared as goods of special importance Issue 1: Imposition of sales tax on cotton yarn under Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 The case involved questions regarding the imposition of sales tax on cotton yarn under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. The controversy arose from the assessibility of sales of cotton yarn by the assessee, M/s Jamuna Das Ram Kishan. The Financial Commissioner's decision in another case, M/s Govind Saran Ganga Saran, initially held that cotton yarn was not assessable due to the absence of a specified stage of imposition. However, the Delhi High Court reversed this decision, stating that sales of cotton yarn were assessable at one stage under the State Sales Tax Act, as long as they were not taxed at more than one stage. This interpretation was supported by the Delhi High Court in subsequent cases as well. Issue 2: Compliance with law regarding tax imposition without fixing a stage The questions raised also pertained to whether the tax imposed on cotton yarn without fixing a stage of imposition was in accordance with the law. The Supreme Court, in the case of M/s Govind Saran Ganga Saran, clarified that for goods declared as special importance under Section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act, the tax should not be levied at more than one stage. The Court emphasized the importance of specifying a single point for tax imposition to ensure clarity and compliance with Section 15 of the Act. In the absence of such specification, the tax imposition would be considered invalid. Issue 3: Conformity with Section 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 The case also addressed whether the tax imposed on cotton yarn without fixing the stage of imposition complied with the provisions of Section 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The Supreme Court's decision highlighted that the State Act should specify a single point for tax levy to meet the requirements of Section 15. Without a clear notification in the Official Gazette by the Chief Commissioner specifying the point of tax imposition, the tax on cotton yarn would not satisfy the conditions of Section 15. Issue 4: Tax imposition on cotton yarn declared as goods of special importance Lastly, the judgment considered the tax imposition on cotton yarn declared as goods of special importance under Section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The Supreme Court's ruling in the case of M/s Govind Saran Ganga Saran emphasized the necessity of adhering to the conditions set forth in Section 15 to prevent multiple taxation stages and ensure clarity in the tax imposition process. In the absence of a specified single point for tax levy, the assessment of tax on cotton yarn would be deemed invalid. In conclusion, the judgment favored the assessee based on the Supreme Court's decision in the case of M/s Govind Saran Ganga Saran, emphasizing the importance of specifying a single point for tax imposition to ensure compliance with the law and prevent multiple taxation stages.
|
